University of Southern California / University College London / /
IndustryTerm
energy scale amounts / sought-after solution / lowest energy eigenstates / energy scale / instantaneous energy gap / energy landscape / energy eigenstate / physical devices / energy gap / flux technology / overall energy scale / energy eigenstates / energy level crossings / energy eigenstate populations / minimal energy spin configuration / controllable overall energy scale / energy spectrum / energy scale factor / minimal energy gap / given energy eigenstate / energy / superconducting flux technology / /
Organization
DW2 PI / London Centre for Nanotechnology / Department of Electronic & Electrical Engineering / University College London / Department of Physics and Astronomy / University of Southern California / Los Angeles / Center for Quantum Information Science & Technology / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / Department of Electrical Engineering / Department of Chemistry / / /
Position
rotor-Monte Carlo model / and three modified versions thereof / classical model for the D-Wave device / /
ProvinceOrState
South Dakota / Maine / Southern California / Hawaii / California / /
Distinguishing Classical and Quantum Models for the D-Wave Device Walter Vinci,1, 2, ∗ Tameem Albash,3, 4, ∗ Anurag Mishra,3, 4 Paul A. Warburton,1, 5 and Daniel A. Lidar3, 4, 6, 7 1 arXiv:1403.4228v1 [quant-ph] 17 M