Panopticism for Police: Structural Reform Bargaining and Police Regulation by Data-Driven Surveillance

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2012-03-27 07:14:52 Law enforcement Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution Exclusionary rule Police Terry v. Ohio Search and seizure Pearson v. Callahan United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Law Searches and seizures Evidence law		Panopticism for Police: Structural Reform Bargaining and Police Regulation by Data-Driven Surveillance Add to Reading List Source URL: digital.law.washington.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 336,42 KB Share Document on Facebook

	United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No___________ DocID: 1rsmc - View Document
	[Cite as State v. Dickerson, 179 Ohio App.3d 754, 2008-OhioIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY DocID: 1r4aA - View Document
	Cite as: 579 U. S. ____SOTOMAYOR, J., dissenting DocID: 1r2f9 - View Document
	PRESENT: Lemons, C.J., Goodwyn, Mims, McClanahan, and Powell, JJ., and Russell and Millette, S.JJ. LOREN MASON OPINION BY SENIOR JUSTICE CHARLES S. RUSSELL May 5, 2016 DocID: 1pVIk - View Document
	[Cite as State v. Gardner, 135 Ohio St.3d 99, 2012-OhioTHE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. GARDNER, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Gardner, 135 Ohio St.3d 99, 2012-OhioCriminal law—Arrest warrant—Reasonabl DocID: 1gBG3 - View Document