<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
United States courts of appeals / Law / Criminal law / Mandatory sentencing / Sentencing / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / Flores-Figueroa v. United States / Theft / Identity theft / United States v. Clark / Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States / Aggravated felony
Date: 2015-08-21 08:19:13
United States courts of appeals
Law
Criminal law
Mandatory sentencing
Sentencing
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Flores-Figueroa v. United States
Theft
Identity theft
United States v. Clark
Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States
Aggravated felony

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Federal Aggravated Identity Theft

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.fas.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 535,47 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Issue #30 | MarchOhio v. Clark: A Bit of Confrontation Clarification, A Few Tantalizing Hints Teresa Garvey, JD 1 The United States Supreme Court decision in Ohio v. Clark2 has been heralded by many prosecutors an

DocID: 1up81 - View Document

Law / Criminal law / Criminal justice / Immigration detention / Habeas corpus / Bail / U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement / Immigration detention in the United States / Clark v. Martinez

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MONY PREAP; EDUARDO VEGA PADILLA; JUAN LOZANO

DocID: 1racz - View Document

United States courts of appeals / Law / Criminal law / Mandatory sentencing / Sentencing / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / Flores-Figueroa v. United States / Theft / Identity theft / United States v. Clark / Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States / Aggravated felony

Mandatory Minimum Sentencing: Federal Aggravated Identity Theft

DocID: 1qhyv - View Document

University and college admissions / University of Texas at Austin / Social inequality / Discrimination / Education policy / Fisher v. University of Texas / Affirmative action / Affirmative action in the United States / Grutter v. Bollinger

Immediate Release: Date: June 23rd 2016 Contact: Dwight Clark "The Ruling Reflects The Inherent Value Of A Diverse Campus" Statement by Senator Menéndez on Fisher v. University of Texas

DocID: 1pxFd - View Document

Hearing / Legal action / Legal procedure / United States congressional hearing / Richardson v. Perales

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Relating to the Lewis and Clark Natural Resources District Rules and Regulations for Conduct of Formal Public Hearings, for Conduct of Informal, Non-Adjudicatory Public Hearings and for Rules and

DocID: 1ptku - View Document