Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Open content / Software / World Wide Web / Wikipedia / Collaborative projects / Wiki / Video game bot / Human–computer interaction / Hypertext / Social information processing


When the Levee Breaks: Without Bots, What Happens to Wikipedia’s Quality Control Processes? R. Stuart Geiger Aaron Halfaker
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2013-09-24 10:09:03


Open Document

File Size: 419,86 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Twidale / /

Company

MIT Press / L. and Smith L.C. / Wikimedia Foundation / Proc GROUP / /

Country

China / /

Currency

USD / /

/

Facility

Levee Breaks / Information University of California / CA GroupLens Research University of Minnesota / /

IndustryTerm

Internet access / algorithmic quality control tools / sociotechnical systems / damage-detection algorithms / software agents / particular tool / human using tools / countervandalism tool / web browsers / tools tools / vandal fighters using tools / heterogeneous quality control network / web browser / neural networks / real time / individual tools / queue-based vandal fighting tool / autonomous software program / quality control network / mining / as many reverts as other tools / assisted tool / socio-technical systems / batch tools / software agent / individual tool / /

Organization

National Science Foundation / MIT / University of California / Berkeley / R. Stuart Geiger Aaron Halfaker School / American Society for Information Science and Technology / University of Minnesota / /

Person

Twinkle / R. Stuart Geiger Aaron / /

Position

editor / critical actor / administrator / human editor / prolific editor / /

ProgrammingLanguage

JavaScript / /

ProvinceOrState

M.B. / /

PublishedMedium

PLoS ONE / /

Technology

control network / damage-detection algorithms / editing technologies / /

SocialTag