Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Rubus phoenicolasius / Omission / Law / Evidence law / Presumption


Wineberry v. N. Star Painting Co.
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2012-09-17 10:47:52

Open Document

File Size: 52,92 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Cleveland / Youngstown / /

Company

Industries & Resources Corp. / Ohio L.L.C. / L.E. Meyers Co. / N. Star Painting Co. / VS. NORTH STAR PAINTING CO. / North Star Painting Company Inc. / /

Event

Person Communication and Meetings / /

Facility

Common Pleas Court / THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT WILLIAM WINEBERRY / Street Bridge / /

IndustryTerm

above case law / job site / law definition / alleged safety device / safety device / protective rubber gloves / electricity / safety devices / safety equipment / required safety equipment / /

Organization

General Assembly / Common Pleas Court / Occupational Safety and Health Administration / Fickle court / UN Court / CSP of Ohio / /

Person

William Wineberry / Gene Donofrio Hon. Cheryl / Joseph J. Vukovich / Jeffrey Leikin Attorney Brenda Johnson / Cheryl L. Waite / Gus Klimis / /

Position

Attorney / guard / magistrate / co-worker / CSP supervisor / supervisor / painter / equipment safety guard / safety guard / second-step apprentice lineman / /

ProvinceOrState

Kentucky / Ohio / /

TVShow

J.E. / /

Technology

Conversion Technologies / /

SocialTag