Boston College Law Review / 962 Boston College Law Review / Wood / Supreme 960 Boston College Law Review / Tyler / /
Continent
America / /
Country
Netherlands / United States / /
Event
Judicial Event / /
Facility
B.U. Pub / Florida State University College of Law / State court / Tulsa College of Law Summer Research Grant / Yale University / /
IndustryTerm
federal law / online media / constitutional law / state criminal justice systems / /
Organization
District Attorney’s Office / Cornell / Attorney’s Office / Boston College / federal habeas court / Yale University / Congress / U.S. Supreme Court / University of Tulsa College of Law Summer Research Grant / Florida State University College of Law / Yale Law School / State court / /
Person
Brian M. Hoffstadt / Nancy King / Larry Yackle / Lyn Entzeroth / Katherine McAllister / Brian R. Means / Lee Kovarsky / Colleen McNamara / Larry W. Yackle / Martin H. Redish / Albert Richards / Eve Brensike Primus / Tamara Piety / Cabell Fassnacht / L. Rev / John Blume / Clarke D. Forsythe / Joseph L. Hoffmann / Justin F. Marceau / Bush / Eric Freedman / Lee L. Rev / Sotomayor / Samuel R. Wiseman / Rethinking / Nancy J. King / Allan Ides / Margery I. Miller / Katherine A. McAllister / /
Position
attorney / Counsel / guard / trial counsel / author / King / Professor / Assistant Professor / federal magistrate judge / state attorney / judge / /
ProvinceOrState
Texas / Tarrant County / Virginia / Alabama / Washington / Florida / California / /
HABEAS AFTER PINHOLSTER Samuel R. Wiseman* Abstract: Until April 2011, every federal habeas court in America could conduct hearings and consider new evidence when reviewing a state court’s interpretation of federal law