From Deep Inference to Proof Nets via Cut Elimination Lutz Straßburger INRIA Saclay–ˆIle-de-France, France http: www.lix.polytechnique.fr ∼ lutz June 24, 2009 - Woodward - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2009-06-25 08:22:18 Logic Mathematical logic Proof theory Sequent Rule of inference Natural deduction Propositional calculus Deep inference Theorem Intuitionistic logic Formal proof Inference		From Deep Inference to Proof Nets via Cut Elimination Lutz Straßburger INRIA Saclay–ˆIle-de-France, France http://www.lix.polytechnique.fr/∼ lutz June 24, 2009 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.lix.polytechnique.fr Download Document from Source Website File Size: 450,19 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Making Automatic Theorem Provers more Versatile Simon Cruanes Veridis, Inria Nancy https://cedeela.fr/~simon/ August 2017 DocID: 1xVS8 - View Document
	Theorem-Proving by Resolution as a Basis for Question-Answering Systems Cordell Green Stanford Research Institute Menlo Park, California DocID: 1xVHV - View Document
	A proof of Minkowski’s second theorem Matthew Tointon Minkowski’s second theorem is a fundamental result from the geometry of numbers with important applications in additive combinatorics (see, for example, its appli DocID: 1xVE5 - View Document
	Theorem Proving using Lazy Proof Expli ation Corma Flanagan1 , Rajeev Joshi1 , Xinming Ou2 , and James B. Saxe1 1 Systems Resear h Center, HP Labs, Palo Alto, CA 2 DocID: 1xVDI - View Document
	A BOUNDEDNESS THEOREM FOR NEARBY SLOPES OF HOLONOMIC D-MODULES by Jean-Baptiste Teyssier Abstract. — Using twisted nearby cycles, we define a new notion of slopes for complex holonomic D-modules. We prove a boundednes DocID: 1xVAt - View Document