City of Indianapolis v. Edmond

Results: 12



#Item
1The Most Special Need of All: The Right to Be Left Alone Analysis of Chicago Public Schools Metal Detector Policy Michael W. Simpson University of Wisconsin-Madison

The Most Special Need of All: The Right to Be Left Alone Analysis of Chicago Public Schools Metal Detector Policy Michael W. Simpson University of Wisconsin-Madison

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.usca.edu

Language: English - Date: 2005-09-28 13:26:52
2No[removed] ================================================================ In The  Supreme Court of the United States

No[removed] ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States

Add to Reading List

Source URL: ij.org

Language: English - Date: 2013-01-03 16:16:40
3No[removed]In the Supreme Court of the United States PATRICK J. LYNCH, and the PATROLMEN’S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioners,

No[removed]In the Supreme Court of the United States PATRICK J. LYNCH, and the PATROLMEN’S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioners,

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.appellate.net

Language: English - Date: 2010-10-27 13:50:58
4No[removed] ================================================================ In The  Supreme Court of the United States

No[removed] ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States

Add to Reading List

Source URL: sblog.s3.amazonaws.com

Language: English - Date: 2013-02-07 10:48:58
5No.  In the Supreme Court of the United States PATRICK J. LYNCH, and the PATROLMEN’S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioners, v.

No. In the Supreme Court of the United States PATRICK J. LYNCH, and the PATROLMEN’S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, INC., Petitioners, v.

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.appellate.net

Language: English - Date: 2010-10-27 13:50:55
6COURTING DISASTER UPDATE: [removed]At the close of its[removed]term, the Supreme Court remains narrowly divided on a number of issues that are extremely important to the rights of all Americans. Out of 87 decisions by

COURTING DISASTER UPDATE: [removed]At the close of its[removed]term, the Supreme Court remains narrowly divided on a number of issues that are extremely important to the rights of all Americans. Out of 87 decisions by

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.pfaw.org

Language: English - Date: 2012-02-25 18:26:42
7[removed]Virginia v.Harris[removed])

[removed]Virginia v.Harris[removed])

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Language: English - Date: 2009-10-20 16:19:30
8No[removed] ================================================================ In The  Supreme Court of the United States

No[removed] ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ij.org

Language: English - Date: 2013-01-03 16:16:40
9No[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner,

No[removed]IN THE Supreme Court of the United States STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner,

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.americanbar.org

Language: English - Date: 2012-10-18 17:40:14
10****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or

****************************************************** The ‘‘officially released’’ date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.jud.state.ct.us

Language: English - Date: 2002-02-08 11:22:43