Concurrent jurisdiction

Results: 30



#Item
1“P.L. 280 & FEDERAL CONCURRENT JURISDICTION” Tom Gede, Member Indian Law & Order Commission •   California Indian Law Association – 15th Annual

“P.L. 280 & FEDERAL CONCURRENT JURISDICTION” Tom Gede, Member Indian Law & Order Commission • California Indian Law Association – 15th Annual

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.calindianlaw.org

Language: English - Date: 2015-11-19 18:16:59
    2http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Split&destina

    http://web2.westlaw.com/print/printstream.aspx?sv=Split&destina

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: freedom-school.com

    Language: English - Date: 2015-05-02 15:02:47
    3ATTACHMENT E  RESOLUTION FOR CONCURRENT POLICE JURISDICTION At the university’s request, the Town of Blacksburg has agreed to allow for concurrent jurisdiction on certain properties owned or leased by the university re

    ATTACHMENT E RESOLUTION FOR CONCURRENT POLICE JURISDICTION At the university’s request, the Town of Blacksburg has agreed to allow for concurrent jurisdiction on certain properties owned or leased by the university re

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.bov.vt.edu

    Language: English - Date: 2016-03-02 19:23:26
      4Personal jurisdiction / Minimum contacts / Internet governance / Cybersell /  Inc. v. Cybersell /  Inc. / Internet / Concurrent jurisdiction / Sovereignty / Email / Personal jurisdiction in Internet cases in the United States / Law / Civil procedure / Jurisdiction

      Sovereignty on the Internet: Ways to Prevent Cyberanarchy Sovereignty Group

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: groups.csail.mit.edu

      Language: English - Date: 1999-01-11 15:08:44
      5CB[removed])  On 9 February 2011 PCCW submitted comments to the Bills Committee on Institutional Arrangements (Component 4). In particular, PCCW suggested that the concurrent jurisdiction proposal be deleted. PCCW

      CB[removed]) On 9 February 2011 PCCW submitted comments to the Bills Committee on Institutional Arrangements (Component 4). In particular, PCCW suggested that the concurrent jurisdiction proposal be deleted. PCCW

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.legco.gov.hk

      Language: English - Date: 2011-05-10 23:31:46
      6[removed]Federal Register / Vol. 79, No[removed]Tuesday, July 1, [removed]Proposed Rules exclusive or concurrent legislative jurisdiction.

      [removed]Federal Register / Vol. 79, No[removed]Tuesday, July 1, [removed]Proposed Rules exclusive or concurrent legislative jurisdiction.

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.gpo.gov

      Language: English - Date: 2014-07-01 11:42:50
      7Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL Chapter 711: EQUITY PROCEEDINGS Table of Contents Part 7. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS................................................................ Section[removed]JURISDICTION..............

      Title 14: COURT PROCEDURE -- CIVIL Chapter 711: EQUITY PROCEEDINGS Table of Contents Part 7. PARTICULAR PROCEEDINGS................................................................ Section[removed]JURISDICTION..............

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.mainelegislature.org

      Language: English - Date: 2014-10-07 02:14:49
      8Title 12: CONSERVATION Chapter 209: NATIONAL FORESTS AND PARKS Table of Contents Part 2. FORESTS, PARKS, LAKES AND RIVERS.............................................. Section 751. CONCURRENT JURISDICTION................

      Title 12: CONSERVATION Chapter 209: NATIONAL FORESTS AND PARKS Table of Contents Part 2. FORESTS, PARKS, LAKES AND RIVERS.............................................. Section 751. CONCURRENT JURISDICTION................

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.mainelegislature.org

      Language: English - Date: 2014-10-06 20:52:27
      9PRESIDENT NIXON, SPECIAL MESSAGE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS JULY 8, 1970

      PRESIDENT NIXON, SPECIAL MESSAGE ON INDIAN AFFAIRS JULY 8, 1970

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: epa.gov

      Language: English - Date: 2013-08-29 14:04:41
      10SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 29 WHEREAS, in Missouri, children between 17 and 18 years of age are considered adults and no longer fall under the jurisdiction of juvenile courts and children as young as 12 years of ag

      SENATE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 29 WHEREAS, in Missouri, children between 17 and 18 years of age are considered adults and no longer fall under the jurisdiction of juvenile courts and children as young as 12 years of ag

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.senate.mo.gov

      Language: English - Date: 2014-02-20 13:25:49