Miller v. Alabama

Results: 13



#Item
1Supreme Court: Miller v. Alabama’s Prohibition on Mandatory Life without Parole Sentences for Children Applies Retroactively. On Monday, January 25, 2016, in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ 2016, the United Stat

Supreme Court: Miller v. Alabama’s Prohibition on Mandatory Life without Parole Sentences for Children Applies Retroactively. On Monday, January 25, 2016, in Montgomery v. Louisiana, 577 U. S. ___ 2016, the United Stat

Add to Reading List

Source URL: childlaw.sc.edu

Language: English - Date: 2016-01-28 14:34:22
    2A Landmark Victory for Juvenile Justice The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision for our movement yesterday, ruling in the companion cases of Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama that mandatory life-without-pa

    A Landmark Victory for Juvenile Justice The U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark decision for our movement yesterday, ruling in the companion cases of Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama that mandatory life-without-pa

    Add to Reading List

    Source URL: www.abpsi.org

    - Date: 2012-09-08 09:59:48
      3POLICY BRIEF: JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE  Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview Most of the approximately 2,500 individuals sentenced as juveniles to life without the possibility of parole now have a chance for rel

      POLICY BRIEF: JUVENILE LIFE WITHOUT PAROLE Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview Most of the approximately 2,500 individuals sentenced as juveniles to life without the possibility of parole now have a chance for rel

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.sentencingproject.org

      Language: English - Date: 2016-07-29 16:13:53
      4[removed]Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama[removed])

      [removed]Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama[removed])

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

      Language: English - Date: 2015-03-25 08:21:52
      5NO[removed]In The Supreme Court of the United States RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners,

      NO[removed]In The Supreme Court of the United States RUBEN CAMPA, RENE GONZALEZ, ANTONIO GUERRERO, GERARDO HERNANDEZ, AND LUIS MEDINA, Petitioners,

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.nlg.org

      Language: English - Date: 2014-12-19 13:01:23
      6Short sentencing guide for representing juveniles facing first-degree murder after Miller v. Alabama – Questions and Responses Including sample motions, pleadings, and mitigation information Updated October 26, 2014 Th

      Short sentencing guide for representing juveniles facing first-degree murder after Miller v. Alabama – Questions and Responses Including sample motions, pleadings, and mitigation information Updated October 26, 2014 Th

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.sado.org

      Language: English - Date: 2014-10-28 21:31:48
      7COHEN[removed]Do Not Delete[removed]:14 AM FREEDOM’S ROAD: YOUTH, PAROLE, AND THE PROMISE OF MILLER V. ALABAMA AND GRAHAM V.

      COHEN[removed]Do Not Delete[removed]:14 AM FREEDOM’S ROAD: YOUTH, PAROLE, AND THE PROMISE OF MILLER V. ALABAMA AND GRAHAM V.

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: www.cardozolawreview.com

      Language: English - Date: 2014-02-19 18:59:45
      8Commentary: The Forgiven As the U.S. Supreme Court hears two cases concerning sentencing youths to life in prison, Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama, a mother and the man who killed her only son found reconciliation

      Commentary: The Forgiven As the U.S. Supreme Court hears two cases concerning sentencing youths to life in prison, Jackson v. Hobbs and Miller v. Alabama, a mother and the man who killed her only son found reconciliation

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: fairsentencingofyouth.org

      Language: English - Date: 2013-02-07 10:15:29
      9What’s “Different” (Enough) in Eighth Amendment Law? Richard S. Frase∗ In Miller v. Alabama 1 and Jackson v. Hobbs 2 the Supreme Court reaffirmed its conclusions in two earlier cases, Roper v. Simmons 3 and Graha

      What’s “Different” (Enough) in Eighth Amendment Law? Richard S. Frase∗ In Miller v. Alabama 1 and Jackson v. Hobbs 2 the Supreme Court reaffirmed its conclusions in two earlier cases, Roper v. Simmons 3 and Graha

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: moritzlaw.osu.edu

      Language: English - Date: 2013-11-29 10:44:10
      10Criminal law / Ethics / Graham v. Florida / Mandatory sentencing / Parole / Gregg v. Georgia / Capital punishment / Law / Life imprisonment / Penology

      Quotations from Miller v. Alabama Holding: Children are Categorically Different from Adults for Sentencing Purposes Roper and Graham establish that children are constitutionally different from adults for purposes of sen

      Add to Reading List

      Source URL: fairsentencingofyouth.org

      Language: English - Date: 2013-01-17 11:45:21