Seychelles–Tanzania Maritime Boundary Agreement

Results: 8



#Item
1page 1| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on[removed]Agreement between the Republic of Finland and the Republic of Estonia on the Boundary of the Maritime Zones in the Gulf of Finland and on the Northern Balt

page 1| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on[removed]Agreement between the Republic of Finland and the Republic of Estonia on the Boundary of the Maritime Zones in the Gulf of Finland and on the Northern Balt

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.un.org

Language: English - Date: 2002-04-29 16:14:48
2Page 1  Exclusive economic zone (No.2) Order, 1978 In excercise of the powers conferred by section 6(2) of the Maritime Zones Act, 1977, the President, considering it necessary so to do having regard to international law

Page 1 Exclusive economic zone (No.2) Order, 1978 In excercise of the powers conferred by section 6(2) of the Maritime Zones Act, 1977, the President, considering it necessary so to do having regard to international law

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.un.org

Language: English - Date: 2001-07-23 17:28:48
3page 1| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on[removed]Agreement between the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania and the Government of the Republic of Seychelles on the Delimitation of the Maritime Bo

page 1| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on[removed]Agreement between the Government of the United Republic of Tanzania and the Government of the Republic of Seychelles on the Delimitation of the Maritime Bo

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.un.org

Language: English - Date: 2003-01-21 15:51:23
4Summary of the Judgment of 27 January 2014

Summary of the Judgment of 27 January 2014

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.icj-cij.org

Language: English - Date: 2014-01-27 06:09:04
5DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE The Court should have determined the maritime boundary between the Parties de novo — There is no agreement between the Parties, tacit or otherwise, establishing a permanent

DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE SEBUTINDE The Court should have determined the maritime boundary between the Parties de novo — There is no agreement between the Parties, tacit or otherwise, establishing a permanent

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.icj-cij.org

Language: English - Date: 2014-01-24 11:15:43
6SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA 1. The Judgment, in its operative part (dispositif) states the decision of the Court, inter alia, as follows:

SEPARATE OPINION OF JUDGE OWADA 1. The Judgment, in its operative part (dispositif) states the decision of the Court, inter alia, as follows:

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.icj-cij.org

Language: English - Date: 2014-01-24 11:13:41
7page 1| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on[removed]Maritime Boundaries: The Gambia / Senegal

page 1| Delimitation Treaties Infobase | accessed on[removed]Maritime Boundaries: The Gambia / Senegal

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.un.org

Language: English - Date: 2002-04-29 16:10:20
8

PDF Document

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.un.org

Language: English - Date: 2002-05-16 18:53:51